Few sentences in Scripture have carried more weight than the last five words of Romans 5:12, and few have been more badly misread. Paul writes that sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and that death then spread to every human being, eph’ hō pantes hēmarton, “because all sinned.”¹

Augustine read that clause in Latin: in quo omnes peccaverunt. In whom all sinned.² Three words. And on those three words the Western church built a doctrine, “Original Sin,” the apostle never taught: that every infant enters the world already guilty of a crime committed by someone else, in another garden, thousands of years earlier.

Let me be clear before I criticize. Augustine was a giant. But greatness is not immunity. And when a giant stumbles, he lands on a lot of people.

The First Error: Hunting for an Antecedent That Was Never There

Augustine’s Greek was weak. He tells us himself that he hated the language as a boy and learned it under the lash, and he worked for most of his life from Latin translations.³ That would matter little in most passages. In Romans 5:12 it mattered enormously, because Paul’s clause turns on a small Greek idiom.

By the first century, eph’ hō had long since fused into a fixed conjunction meaning “because” or “inasmuch as.” Paul uses it that way elsewhere without difficulty.⁴ It is not a relative pronoun waiting for a noun to attach itself to. Asking what eph’ hō refers back to is like asking what the word “however” refers back to. The question itself is the mistake.

---

---

Augustine asked it anyway. He noticed that Latin in quo is masculine or neuter, reasoned that it therefore could not point back to hamartia, “sin,” which is feminine in Greek, and concluded that it must point back across five clauses to one man, Adam.⁵ So the sentence stopped saying “death spread to all because all sinned,” and began saying “death spread to all because all sinned in Adam.” Every human being became a participant in a sin he did not commit, seminally present in Adam’s body, personally implicated in Adam’s guilt.⁶

The reading fails on its own terms. The proposed antecedent is impossibly distant. The preposition epi with the dative does not mean “inside of.” And most decisively, Paul had already used the identical phrase pantes hēmarton three chapters earlier: “all sinned and fall short of the glory of God.”⁷ Nobody has ever read that verse to mean “all sinned in Adam.” It means exactly what it says. Every one of us, personally, has sinned.

Here is the part Western Christians are rarely told: the Greek-speaking church, which needed no translator, never read the verse Augustine’s way. Chrysostom took the clause causally, as did the Eastern tradition after him.⁸ What we inherit from Adam, they said, is death. Mortality, corruption, a world bent out of shape, a body that ages and fails, a moral situation we did not choose. We sin because we die. We do not die because we are already guilty.⁹ Ancestral sin, not inherited guilt.

And Scripture itself (Ezekiel 18:20) forbids what Augustine constructed. “The person who sins shall die. A son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor a father the guilt of the son.”¹⁰ The Torah says the same thing in the plainest legal terms.¹¹ A God who holds a newborn liable for Adam’s trespass is a God who violates his own law. Augustine’s doctrine did not merely misread a Greek particle. It made the Judge of all the earth into a defendant.

Augustine’s Second Error: Letting Adam Outrun Christ

The first error was exegetical. The second is worse, because it inverted the entire argument of the chapter.

Romans 5 is not fundamentally about Adam. Adam is the smaller half of a comparison. Paul’s whole engine is pollō mallon, “how much more.”¹² The logic runs from lesser to greater. If one man’s trespass could contaminate a whole race, how much more can one man’s obedience heal it. Adam is the measuring stick, and Christ is the thing being measured, and the entire point is that Christ overflows the measurement.

Then comes verse 18, where Paul draws the two halves together. As one trespass led to condemnation for all people, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all people. The same phrase, eis pantas anthrōpous, appears on both sides of the sentence.¹³

Augustine kept the first “all” universal and quietly shrank the second. The result is a gospel in which Adam’s reach is total and Christ’s is partial. Sin travels further than grace. Damnation is efficient and salvation is selective. Paul’s “how much more” is turned on its head, and the reader is left with a Christ who cannot quite undo what one man in a garden managed to do.

Why would so careful a thinker do this? Because his anthropology had already decided the outcome. Once you believe every infant is born guilty, and once you observe that infants die unbaptized, you are forced somewhere. Augustine went where the premise took him: humanity is a massa damnata, a lump of condemnation, and God would be perfectly just to save none of it. Infants who die without baptism are punished, he concluded, though with the gentlest punishment of all.¹⁴ He accepted that conclusion rather than let it correct the premise that produced it.

His fiercest opponent saw exactly what had happened. Julian of Eclanum accused Augustine of never fully leaving the Manichees behind, of still carrying the instinct that flesh itself transmits contamination and that procreation passes on defilement.¹⁵ Julian was arrogant, and he was wrong about a great deal. On this he was not wrong. Augustine had spent nine years among people who taught that matter is corrupt and that the body is a prison. A man can renounce a system and still keep its reflexes.

Why This Is Not an Argument About the Past

It would be a mercy if this were merely a historical dispute. It is not. Whole traditions of preaching still begin with the assumption that God is already angry at the newborn, that the default relationship between the Creator and his creature is prosecution, and that grace exists chiefly to hold back a wrath that was aimed at us from the first breath. Children raised on that message do not learn to love God. They learn to manage him.

Jewish tradition never required inherited guilt to explain why people sin. It spoke instead of the yetzer, the inclination, the pull toward what is wrong that sits inside every human heart from youth.¹⁶ We are born fragile, mortal, and bent. We are born into a world already wounded by everyone who came before us. And every one of us, given time and opportunity, sins. Paul says nothing less than this. He simply does not say more.

What we inherit from Adam is a graveyard, not a criminal record.

And the good news of Romans 5 is that the graveyard is not the last word, because the “much more” belongs to God. Augustine, of all people, should have loved that sentence. He had lived it. It is one of the sadder ironies of church history that a man rescued so extravagantly by grace bequeathed to the West a theology in which grace arrives late, arrives narrowly, and never quite catches up to the damage.

Enjoyed the article? Let’s continue this important conversation here: The Gospel Before Christianity: A Jewish Perspective on Jesus’ Atonement, Sacrifice, and Redemption.

Notes

1. Rom. 5:12. Greek text from Novum Testamentum Graece, 28th rev. ed. (Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012). Translations are my own unless otherwise noted. ↩
2. So the Old Latin tradition and the Vulgate at Rom. 5:12. ↩
3. Augustine, Confessions 1.13.20; 1.14.23. On the extent and limits of his Greek, see Peter Brown, Augustine of Hippo: A Biography, rev. ed. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000), chap. 3. ↩
4. 2 Cor. 5:4; Phil. 4:10; cf. Phil. 3:12. For a full survey of the interpretive options and the case for the causal sense, see Joseph A. Fitzmyer, Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary, Anchor Bible 33 (New York: Doubleday, 1993), 413–17. ↩
5. Augustine, Against Two Letters of the Pelagians 4.4.7, in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, vol. 5, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature, 1887). ↩
6. Augustine, On the Merits and Forgiveness of Sins, and on the Baptism of Infants 1.10–11, NPNF1 5; see also City of God 13.14, where he states that we all were that one man. ↩
7. Rom. 3:23, pantes gar hēmarton. ↩
8. John Chrysostom, Homilies on the Epistle of St. Paul the Apostle to the Romans, Homily 10 (on Rom. 5:12), in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, vol. 11, ed. Philip Schaff (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature, 1889). The Latin reading was not Augustine’s invention; it appears earlier in Ambrosiaster, who glossed in quo as “in Adam.” See Ambrosiaster: Commentaries on Romans and 1–2 Corinthians, trans. and ed. Gerald L. Bray, Ancient Christian Texts (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2009), at Rom. 5:12. ↩
9. John Meyendorff, Byzantine Theology: Historical Trends and Doctrinal Themes (New York: Fordham University Press, 1974), 143–46. ↩
10. Ezek. 18:20. ↩
11. Deut. 24:16. ↩
12. Rom. 5:15, 17. ↩
13. Rom. 5:18. ↩
14. Augustine, Enchiridion 93; on the massa damnata, see Enchiridion 27 and City of God 21.12. ↩
15. The charge runs throughout Augustine’s replies to him; see Against Julian and the unfinished Opus imperfectum contra Julianum. ↩
16. Gen. 6:5; 8:21; cf. b. Berakhot 61a. ↩